A Tokyo district court ruled that Japan’s ban on same-sex marriage does not violate the constitution, maintaining the current legal stance that marriage should only be between a man and a woman.
The ruling contrasts with previous decisions from courts in Sapporo and Nagoya, which had suggested that the lack of legal recognition for same-sex unions could breach constitutional guarantees of equality.
Under Japan’s constitution, marriage is defined as being based on “the mutual consent of both sexes.” Opponents of same-sex marriage argue that the phrase explicitly means unions between a man and a woman.
Proponents of marriage equality, however, claim this interpretation is outdated and discriminatory. They contend that Japan’s refusal to recognize same-sex marriages denies equal rights and hinders social progress.
LGBTQ+ activists expressed disappointment, emphasizing that the decision sends a discouraging message to couples seeking legal recognition of their relationships. Polls show a growing share of the Japanese public supports same-sex marriage, particularly among younger generations.
Despite the Tokyo court’s decision, reform advocates plan to continue pressing lawmakers to revise the civil code and expand legal protections for same-sex couples.
“We will keep fighting for equality. This ruling is a setback, but it won’t stop our movement,” said an activist quoted after the hearing.
Author’s Summary: Tokyo’s court reaffirmed that Japan’s constitution restricts marriage to male-female couples, slowing the momentum for nationwide same-sex marriage rights but fueling continued activism.